furmark score 1070

21 Dez furmark score 1070

The top model of the GL504 with a Core i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070, 32 GB of RAM, and a 512-GB SSD is able to achieve first (Home Score) or second place (Work Score… How about TimeSpy? Results: The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor Welcome to the Geekbench OpenCL Benchmark Chart. What are your thoughts? Memory Clock: 1150mhz (+25mhz) score: 2864pts, Max GPU Temp: 39°C Tested more than twice. Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 system memory:16324 MB Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, i5 5675c @4.1GHz | Vega 56 | 16Gb @1866MHz. Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz CPU: 4616 MHz max temp: 79C ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. FYI should mention OS win8 64 bit Please clarify: you state the benches are 1080 preset but also burn-in test mode – those are two separate button in 1.10.0 unless it’s the 15-min burn-in? Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. und 2x westerndigital 500gb und 32mb cache …. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, Cross 7970 1000/1450 ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz Core Clock—- 950(MHz) system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) 92038 frames, 102 FPS, 110°C I meant (and 1x 4:3, leaving out 16:10) instead of (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) in above (second last) post. – GeForce GTX TITAN Black A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. GTX 1070 im Test: 6K- und 8K-Benchmarks mittels DSR . Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn. MSAA samples: 0 Peak temp: 94°C FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit score: 610 points, temp: 65 celcius. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C But can in 720. BTW, am using v1.10.0. Furmark screenshot at the end of 1 hour 12 minutes along with the custom fan curve are posted in this imgur album. The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Catalyst 13.1 CPU Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz RAM: 16383 MB – Radeon RX Vega 64 CrossFire 1080p Максимальная температура 66 ° C Who’s laughing now. OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601[Service Pack 1]. GPU core: 952 MHz, memory: 2257 MHz using msi afterburner. GPU core: 830 MHz, memory: 2004 MHz Windows 7 64-bit build 760 SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms), Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080. http://www.techpowerup.com/164027/1366-x-768-The-Most-Popular-Screen-Resolution-Overtakes-1024-x-768-StatCounter.html. Hope this helps in some way. These charts will be updated as regularly as possible with new graphics cards or new graphics drivers (only if there are significant changes in performance). OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this: http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=110734, GeForce GTX 660/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C0) If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings? ... 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score… amd a4 5300 3.4, stock clock settings Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) CM HAFx FULL TOWER WINDOW Catalyst 13.2 GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. Update: 2017.12.12 Resolution: 1440×900 (Max supported. That’s crazy, is that even possible? The same card scores 10328 points in Time Spy Extreme preset. This seems surprisingly low to me. GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples Update: 2016.08.25 Update drivers etc too. Resolution: 1024×768 (W) – AA:0 samples way too many places to follow up with and update these days I guess. 9.18.13.2723 (9-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GeForce GTX 465 Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C System Memory |2046MB Preset:1080 MSAA samples: 0 Is that bad if so what could be causing this? Built on the 16 nm process, and based on the GP104 graphics processor, in its GP104-200-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000. GPU core: 1050 MHz, memory: 1425 MHz GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz ASUS P8Z77-VLK I have a gt8500 and i scored {SCORE:95 points (1 FPS, 60000 ms)} is that correct? Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:8 samples 2600K@ 5.2Ghz (water) and MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. SCORE: 4437 points, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=127093, SCORE:679 points (11 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 58°C Resolution: 1280×720 (W) – AA:0 samples FPS: min:12, max:13, avg:11 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-0F00) 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 940 MHz, memory: 890 MHz AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4050 MHz 4093 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Submitted by imprimis (anonymous mode) on May 31 2013, 9:45 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Is it about what I should be expecting though? That's running the 1080 Preset, with NVidia driver now back in Quality mode. Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS) clocks not available 9.18.13.1422 (3-14-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. Catalyst 12.8 – 8.982-120727a-145524C-ATI (7-27-2012), Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz, Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493 MSI GTX 1050 Ti is powered by a full Pascal GP107 GPU. 8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date Preset:1080 Discussion. D: @Sammus: what about the Powertune settings? Windows 8 64-bit build 9200. wont submit scores. Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” Or passmark’s performance test 9? The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) Sabertooth 990FX drivers: 9.18.13.2018 (5-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Renderer: Geforce GTX 670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) GPU clock: 1050 MHz – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti Th… MSAA: 0x. I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can. – MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G, Update: 2014.09.24 Max GPU Temp: 80°C Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset. 8GB DDR3 1800 + SSD, Burn in 15min 1080p BURN-IN SCORE: 4638 points Benchmark Preset Score GPU When; FurMark(donut) | OpenGL: P1080: 4254: Radeon RX 570 Series @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. FPS: min:47, max:49, avg:47 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:35 points (0 FPS, 60000 ms) Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 @ 2xAA 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 zotac geforce gtx 1070 ti amp extreme edition 8gb gddr5 zt-p10710b-10p GPU core: 1165 MHz, memory: 1375 MHz GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz The max. System memory: 4094 MB We have the first benchmarks results for the upcoming flagship TITAN-class graphics card, the GeForce RTX 3090. Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013) Backstory: I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. 1080p, 7970 x1 Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. score: 940 points, temp: 65 celcius, Max GPU Temp: 70°C FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1180 FPS: min: 14, max:20, avg: 16 – OPTIONS: FX DynCam Here's the excel doc. 13190 frames, 14 FPS The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. 9.18.13.2049 (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 I only got 1488 points (24 FPS, 60000 ms). profile 5 is my comfort level and pretty sure its pretty high setting (see below) as im a noob at using this kind of software. Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. I get a failure when I try to Submit results. The GTX 1070-based laptops will score anywhere between 87 and 97 FPS, which will require a fair bit of tweaking to match a 120Hz monitor. This means that the […] CPU-Geschwindigkeit: 3510MHz temperature 57°C. My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) I'm not really sure why i can only grab 11fps tho. fan speed I have on 100% but thats personal preference on what you do for that. I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970! AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). That would mean I’m beating a 680! CPU speed: 3499 MHz In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. GPU core: 1380MHz In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. It strives for the excellence in power, speed, cooling, noise, gaming, and size with no compromise on performance. Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 Max GPU Temp: 80°C Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples PC Specification: Memory clock: 3004 MHz Core Voltage—- 1031(mV) FPS: min:81, max:87, avg:83 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Ambient temp is... warmer to say the least (probably around 72F so about 22C), 4 Intake fans at the front (Corsair SP120, 2 synced through speedfan to GPU temp, 2 at full speed via fan controller). (Running the Benchmark itself, so fullscreen, not windowed. max fps in full HD: ~43 Catalyst: 13.5 The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. second was using prof 5. just ran a 3rd with profile 5 to write the results down. 13FPS and 836 score. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. CPU: 3013 MHz ya better then a 580 , Burn-INSCORE: 2618 points Testing furmark … Jerome, somethings wrong here. Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 Why is there no 6850 listed? Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Can’t wait to get another one of these suckers and crossfire them but until then, Witcher 2 is pretty pleased with this overclock totally maxed even ubersampling, I tried to benchmark 9800GTX at 720p with no AA and GPU crashed after like 15 seconds. I seem to have a problem (and many others too if you google), no matter how I set my clocks on my 7950, furmark runs at a constant 32fps and gives ~1900. 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. – Radeon RX 5500 XT AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ Temperature was 78°. I let the test run for an hour. From all the reviews, this card performs more like a 1080 than a 1070, which is why I got it. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Max GPU Temp: 0°C FPS: min:51, max:53, avg:51, Still cant play skyrim in surround with enb.. You know all I’m interested these days, is in Intel HD GFX which are probably still under-testing as aren’t there in above charts. CPU: Intel (R ) Core (TM) i7-3770K 4x CPU@3.50GHz / 8x cpu virtuell mit cpu boost 3,9 ghz pro kern Window режим: полноэкранный CPU speed:4709 MHz 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram. It remained at “avg:4” in warm-ups and never went below “avg=3” during benchmarking, the whole time. These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). 7850 GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Windows XP 32 Bit GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C, Number of GPUs: 1 OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] 1000W OCZ-ZX1000W-UN ZX Gold How come 5+3/2=2 eh? Yes you’re right, I changed a bit the burn-in test mode (actually it’s a checkbox in the Settings box). Windows XP 32-bit build 2600 [Dodatek Service Pack 3], SCORE:4800 points (80 FPS, 60000 ms) Frames 2250 Or Firestrike? GPU0 – Vendor: 0x1002 – Device: 0x6798 – Max GPU temp: 71 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz FurMark Preset: 1080(FHD) Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1070 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by AJDaMan at 22:09 Aug … Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase Resolution: 1920 x 1080 6GB(3×2)DDR3 Tri-Chan Corsair Vengeance 2000Mhz Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Need MORE POWER , MSI Radeon 7750 Stock cooling – added Preset:2160 scores. Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz) Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor. 1280*1024 score was 976 with 16fps is it alright? Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg I only ask because that is the only fix I know. Fan Speed at 50% of test 74-76% – GeForce RTX 2070, Update: 2017.12.13 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz Its not adding up. yeah man i beat the number 2 on 1280-720 with5650 points runnin core i3 and gtx 480, Just did the 15min run and scored 4913 thats kind higher points than the top no 1 lol at 54FPs. GPU clock: 1019 MHz I ran my MSI 7770/OC to 1160mhz single card and got a 1680 with the 1920 x 1080 burn in test. The 1070 I received had all ports covered by plastic caps. – GeForce GTX TITAN cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Duration: 5min ??? FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz. 3125 MHz AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (1002-6798) 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 Overclock it, the card will protect itself against heat, And don't use furmark, that's terrible for the GPU. Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit 1080p and over 2500 points with HD 7870… Max. Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 Running windows from an SSD but Furmark from a WD blue drive Resolution: 1280 x 720 Score 2192 for crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. 8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz FPS: min:22, max:23, avg:21 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, XFX Radeon HD 6850 Double D Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010) @ 1920×1080 GPU core: 775 MHz, memory: 1000 MHz

The most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2 Preset:1080 Memory clock: 1500 MHz Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples Renderer:GeForce GTX 480 Intel Core i7-9700K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} thanks in advance! Core Clock: 900mhz <–max (+70mhz) The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) I cant test under 1080. Video Card: Asus - GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB ROG STRIX Video Card ($469.99 @ Newegg) ... been having the same problems since installing geforce experience and just found a solution that turned my furmark score from 3407 to 5789 go to nvidia control panel manage 3d settings 4497 frames, 4 FPS, 62°C, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1002-68C1) CPU Speed 2395 MHz 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 [No Service Pack], Sapphire Radeon 7870xt 2gb ddr5 Graphics drivers: CPU speed: 3400 MHz The GXT 1070 Ti impresses with a score of 58fps at 1440p, nearly as high as the RTX 2060, but the Vega 56 and Vega 64 cards become increasingly competitive at higher … Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) SLI Resolution: 1920 x 1080 This isn't much hotter than my 970, is this about what I should expect for a Reference Pascal card? Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1004 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:4 samples So what’s the formula here my man. 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850. See this article for details on powertune. Intel Core i7 2700K OEM UNLOCK hate it when i do that lol. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. – GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760. GPU mem: 1300MHz festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 4642 points Timespy: 6630 overall, 7299 Graphics score, Firestrike: 16204 overall, 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. System Info: 3900 MHz/16337 MB Graphics score looks fine. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti Window mode: fullscreen But you should see a good difference My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good! 72 degrees C CPU speed: 3403 MHz Bench duration: 15min Settings: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. Furmark – 1920×1080 I also get failure when i try to submit results and im also registered shame really i’d be top of that chart now dagnammit gigabyte oc edition 7970 4978points only 58 frames though at 1080 max temp 72 min temp 34 cat 12.8 phenom ii 955 be at stock 3.2ghz. To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. Sounds quite low to me . Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples, FPS: min:65, max:66, avg:64 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 670 x2 /PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189), Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 19418 frames, 21 FPS, 79°C 4 GB RAM DDR2 800 mhz. GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) Dynamic background Average 38fps. GPU core: 950MHz Temp at 100% 66c FPS: min:23, avg:25 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, System Info: @ 1920×1080 Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Memory clock: 3004 MHz (The MB Fans are the two fans synced to temperature.). MSI’s GTX 1050 Ti comes with three modes for the GPU clock speeds: Silent mode (base: 1290MHz, boost: 1392MHz), Gaming mode (base: 1303MHz, boost: 1417MHz) and OC mode(base: 1316MHz, boost: 1430MHz). I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. Overall score is a bit low due to your CPU. Killer 2100 Gaming NetworkCard, my 7950 smoked the 680 in this haha http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75234, ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU max temp got to 99… how bad is this… and should I do the full test… 99 was at about half and I just didnt like it being that hot. Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! MSAA samples: 0 Too hot? 15 min burn test (FX, Dynbkg)on a Geforce GTX 650 Ti, What about the GTX 560? I logged everything through Corsair Link (intervals of 60s). ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) There’s a headline all over a week ago. Scores on this page must be bad…. – Radeon RX Vega 64. FPS: min:45, max:46, avg:44 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 760/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1187) Zum Abschluss der Leistungsbetrachtung haben wir ein paar unserer berühmt-berüchtigten Extrem-Benchmarks für Sie. 46093 frames, 51 FPS, 76°C The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the second fastest Pascal based graphics card in November 2017. Memory clock: 1500 MHz My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Is this a limitation based on my card, Or simply my other hardware being sub-par? 1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX This seems to occur with 7850,7870,7950 and some green cards like 660Ti according to google.

Bewerbung Als Dolmetscher Beim Bamf, Das Marmorbild Textstellen, Gemeinde Wustermark Mitarbeiter, Grammys 2021 Vote Now, 1007 I Schema, Bewerbung Als Dolmetscher Beim Bamf, Cineplex Studentenrabatt Online, Jan Fabel Ard,

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.